Urban Policy & Strategy
Policy review and research supporting practical urban development decisions.
01 · What this plan helps resolve
Urban policy work begins with a defined problem: what is preventing a programme, institution or place from achieving the intended outcome? A useful study connects the evidence to options, institutional responsibilities and actions that can be monitored.
We support policy and regulatory reviews, programme design and implementation strategies. The brief identifies the policy question, decision maker, affected groups and evidence required. A policy study is distinguished from a statutory spatial planning instrument, while its links to land use, service delivery and existing plans are examined where relevant.
02 · When to commission this service
- A public body, institution or programme team is reviewing an urban policy or delivery approach.
- Responsibilities, incentives or implementation arrangements need to be examined alongside spatial and social evidence.
- A client needs a reasoned options assessment and a practical framework for action and monitoring.
03 · Outputs for your commissioning team
- An evidence and policy review explaining the problem, relevant instruments, institutional context and gaps in available information.
- An options assessment drawing together research, stakeholder findings and the trade-offs behind alternative approaches.
- Recommendations and an implementation framework with action owners, indicators and review arrangements suited to the commission.
04 · From brief to planning package
- Agree the policy question and decision context
- Review evidence, comparable approaches and stakeholder views
- Develop recommendations and a practical monitoring framework
05 · Starting information
- Policy brief and existing instruments
- Available studies and programme data
- Stakeholder and institutional context
06 · Scope and responsibilities
The proposal defines the commissioned outputs, professional roles, data needs and review process. Technical, statutory and partner responsibilities are agreed before work starts.
For technical teams
Physical and Land Use Planning Act, 2019; Ministry of Lands Physical and Land Use Planning Handbook, December 2025.
Points to agree in the technical brief
- Define the policy question, responsible institution and decision or programme that the study must inform.
- Agree the existing policies and evidence to review, stakeholders to involve and criteria for comparing options.
- Set the implementation responsibilities, resource assumptions and indicators that will make the strategy usable after handover.
07 · Common questions
Is a policy strategy the same as a statutory plan?
No. The brief identifies the instrument and decision process required. The study's title alone does not establish statutory status.
Can the work be limited to one policy issue?
Yes. A tightly defined research question can produce a more useful scope, evidence base and set of recommendations than a broad general review.
How is implementation considered?
The commission identifies the institutions, resources, dependencies and monitoring measures relevant to the recommendations, with assumptions and outstanding decisions made explicit.
Related services
Socio-Economic & Spatial Baseline Studies →
County Spatial & Land Use Planning →
Explore Physical & Land Use Planning →
Explore all services →
Make the next step clear
Share the location, your intended outcome and the information already available. Discuss your project →