Case Study: How Makueni’s Spatial Planning Model Drives Sustainable County Development
- Felix Kariba
- Aug 23
- 3 min read
Updated: Aug 24
Makueni County, a semi-arid region in Kenya’s Eastern region, is setting a national example in sustainable, inclusive planning through its County Spatial Plan (CSP) and subsequent integration into its County Integrated Development Plan (CIDP) 2018–2022. By grounding its development strategy in spatial data, community input, and climate resilience, Makueni shows how counties can align local priorities with national goals such as Vision 2030, the Physical and Land Use Planning Act (2019), and the National Climate Change Action Plan (NCCAP).

At Lybrae Spatial Solutions, we studied Makueni’s approach to extract replicable best practices that other counties can adopt to promote resilient and coherent land use planning.
Why Makueni’s Planning Model Matters
Spanning over 8,034 km² and home to about 1 million residents, Makueni faces complex development challenges: water scarcity, erratic rainfall, land degradation, and growing urban centers like Wote and Emali.
Instead of addressing these challenges piecemeal, Makueni adopted a comprehensive County Spatial Plan (2018–2028)—which informed the CIDP 2018–2022. Key innovations in the plan include:
1. Zoning for Sustainability
Makueni designated clear zones for agriculture (covering over 80% of land), conservation, and urban growth. This helped:
Protect sensitive ecosystems like Chyulu Hills and parts of the Tsavo ecosystem
Prevent land-use conflicts by pre-emptively managing urban sprawl
Promote economic zones in strategic towns like Wote, Emali, Kibwezi, and Makindu
2. Climate-Resilient Planning
By integrating climate risk data, Makueni’s plan prioritized:
Drought-resistant crops
Rainwater harvesting infrastructure
Ecosystem restoration (e.g., degraded catchment areas)
This aligns with the NCCAP (2018–2022) and Kenya’s obligations under the Paris Agreement.
3. Participatory, Community-Centric Approach
Extensive consultations with farmers, pastoralists, traders, and youth ensured planning reflected local priorities:
In Kathonzweni, residents proposed beekeeping zones (apiculture) to diversify livelihoods and conserve vegetation
Local elders contributed to mapping sacred groves and community forests, enhancing cultural heritage conservation
4. Data-Driven Decision-Making
Makueni’s planners leveraged GIS mapping, remote sensing, and land-use change analysis (2000–2016) to:
Identify deforestation hotspots
Predict future urban growth corridors
Assess risks like flood-prone zones or overgrazed lands
What Other Counties Can Learn
Invest in Planning Tools & Technology
Counties like Kitui, Narok, and Tana River can adopt GIS-based planning to identify environmental vulnerabilities and allocate land efficiently.
Embed Climate Adaptation
Semi-arid and coastal counties can mirror Makueni’s climate focus:
Garissa: sand dams, rangeland zoning
Kilifi: flood buffering zones and mangrove protection
Institutionalize Community Participation
Counties with land-use conflict—e.g., Laikipia or Isiolo—can replicate participatory mapping to build trust and resolve competing claims.
Align with National Frameworks
Makueni’s spatial plan aligns with:
Vision 2030 pillars (economic, social, political)
National Spatial Plan (2015–2045)
Physical and Land Use Planning Act (2019)
Other counties, like Kisumu, Uasin Gishu, or Machakos, can strengthen their CPLUDPs by aligning zoning with national development targets (e.g., industrialization, affordable housing).
Key Takeaways
Spatial planning should precede or inform the CIDP — not follow it
Data and technology improve accuracy and legitimacy of plans
Community involvement enhances implementation and reduces conflict
Alignment with legal frameworks ensures funding and legitimacy
Conclusion: A Blueprint for Counties Nationwide
Makueni’s example proves that spatial planning is not just a legal requirement — it’s a development multiplier. By embedding sustainability, resilience, and equity into its land-use framework, Makueni shows that counties can turn planning documents into real, lasting change.
As the next generation of CIDPs and CPLUDPs are prepared across Kenya, counties must follow Makueni’s lead: grounding ambition in spatial reality.



